|
RATIONALE FOR A GROUP INTERVENTION
The apparent centrality of psychosocial factors to depression in women
suggests that much might be done through early identification and
treatment of symptoms through psychotherapeutic intervention. Once
women have been identified, groups can be established. At minimal
expense, these groups may provide the support necessary to develop
and establish successful coping strategies for women while preventing
more serious depression (Gordon & Ledray, 1985).
A group approach can be far superior to individual treatment for women
in that it contact with peers who are likely to be dealing with some
of the same allows life problems (Maykowsky, 1980). Coping strategies
can be tested and shared within the supportive, safe environment of
a group. For instance, groups have been recognized as especially important
in helping to lower the group members' acknowledged sense of helplessness
and powerlessness and their feelings of isolation (Davis. 1977). Further,
van Servellen and Dull (1981) have demonstrated group therapy as an
effective medium to promote positive change in self-esteem of depressed
women. Dinnauer. Miller. & Frankforter (1981) emphasize the strength
of groups as providing an important structure for women's social learning.
In fact. Back and Taylor (1976) assert that the value of group intervention
can go far beyond its original purpose and provides the individuals
with a sense of community.
In addition, groups tend to be more cost effective than individual
psychotherapy (Ventura et al.. 1985). The lowering of the financial
costs of therapy for depressed women in groups facilitated by nurses
can be phenomenal. Research by Marks (1977), Ginsberg & Marks
(1977), Carter (1971), and Fagin (1983) suggests that nurses can deliver
psychotherapy services to consumers both effectively and economically
(Hardin & Durham, 1985). Although the subjects in this longitudinal
investigation and in the two previous pilot studies were not charged
fees, this reported nurse-directed cognitive therapy has been estimated
to be a cost savings of up to 74% per person (Twin Cities Community
Program for Affordable Health Care, 1984). This cost-saving comparison
is made between the depressed woman attending the reported nurses'
groups or her attending inpatient and/or office-based group sessions
led by a psychologist or psychiatrist.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Recruitment and Screening of Participants
Depressed women were solicited from the London area by a public service
radio broadcast (BBC) in 1983 to participate in a research project.
Screening of participants was conducted in three stages. Preliminary
screening took place during the radio broadcast. The announcement
indicated that in order to be eligible for participation in the study,
an individual had to be a depressed woman who was not at present seeing
a counselor or psychiatrist and did speak English. Interested individuals
who phoned and fit the initial criteria (n =119) were scheduled to
take the written screening measures that included the Beck Depression
Inventory (BDI), (Beck et al., 1961) and the SCL-90-R (Derogatis,
1976). Volunteers who met the following criteria were selected as
eligible for participation in the study: a BDI score of at least 14
and scores within "normal" limits on the SCL-90-R (not psychotic,
psychopathic, or suicidal). From the 81 potential participants who
passed the written screening criteria. 20 women were randomly selected
to participate in the investigation. Of the 20 selected subjects,
all women were white and upper middle class, with a mean age of 51
years. Eight women were married and had children, while one was divorced,
five were separated, four were single, and two were widowed. Twelve
women were working, one was unemployed, and seven were homemakers.
TREATMENT AND MEASUREMENT SESSIONS
Before the initial session, all participants were administered the
BDI (Beck, 1972), the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Ryden, 1978),
the Beck Hopelessness Scale (Rush. 1982), and the Young Loneliness
Scale (Young. 1981). Then the participants were assigned randomly
to either the treatment group or the no-treatment control group. Participants
in the control group {n = 10) received no intervention and were asked
to refrain from joining other therapy groups or seeking counseling
while the study was going on unless necessary. None of the control
group participants sought treatment for depression. Demographic differences
between the experimental and control groups appeared incidental regarding
age, marital status, working full-time or part-time. In addition,
at the time of the initial session, the treatment and control groups
did not differ significantly in their levels of depression, self-esteem,
hopelessness, or loneliness.
Participants in the treatment group (n = 10) attended 14 weekly
(two-hour) group sessions facilitated by two psychiatric nurses,
both trained and experienced in behavioral and cognitive therapy.
The treatment was an application of the cognitive-behavioral structured
group approach based on the Gordon model as explicated in two workbooks
(Facilitator's Manual and Women's Workbook). The two nurse facilitators
were provided with a Facilitator's Manual that included information
on group dynamics, reinforcement theory, and evaluation of group
processes. Included in the manuals were specific lecture content,
objectives, and discussion questions for each of the 14 group sessions.
Each nurse also recorded her observations of the session after each
group was over.
The women in the treatment group met for two hours weekly at Chelsea
College, University of London. The treatment group sessions consisted
of one hour of lecture, education, and discussion, and a second
hour devoted to specific activities related to issues addressed
by that particular session. Each subject in the treatment group
was provided with a Women's Workbook and was expected to come to
the group sessions with the assigned homework completed. Weekly
topics included goal setting. feelings and depression, cognitions
and feelings, self-worth, relationships, communication skills, assertiveness,
conflict management, decision making, stress, relaxation, exercise,
nutrition, menstruation/menopause, and strength building.
Application of Beck's cognitive theory aided group members to become
more aware of their negative thoughts and behavior. These women
became aware of their defense mechanisms and learned more effective
coping skills, eliminating negative defenses. Positive reinforcement
(Lewinsohn's behavioral theory) was given for attitudinal and behavioral
changes in group members. Seligman's learned helplessness theory
was helpful to the depressed women in gaining insight into their
dependency and learning more appropriate communication skills to
enhance their self-esteem. A more detailed description of the treatment
procedure and evidence of its efficacy is presented in Gordon (1986).
Immediately after the 14th session of the treatment group, all
20 participants were readministered the inventories they had taken
before the first session. In June 1986, 36 months after the final
treatment session, the participants in the treatment and control
groups were contacted by mail and asked to complete the four inventories
again. Of the potential population of 20 participants, 18 (n = 10
and n = 8 for the treatment and the control group respectively)
were contacted and agreed to take part in the follow-up. Two participants
could not be contacted.
INSTRUMENTS USED IN THE STUDY
BDI.
(Beck. 1978) is a 21-item self-report measure (range = 0 to 63) used
to measure level of depression. The internal consistency and validity
of this widely use instrument has been well documented (Beck &
Beamesderfer, 1974; Shaw, 1977). The test-retest stability is high
(r's = .86 to .93) and the measure appears sensitive to spontaneous
or treatment related change (Beck, 1972). Also, the relationship between
the BDI and other indices of depression such as Hamilton's Rating
Scale is strong (e.g.. correlation coefficient of .75; Schwab, Bralow,
& Holzec. 1967).
The SCL-90-R Inventory. The
SCL-90-R Inventory (Derogatis. 1976) is a 90-item self-report measure
used to screen for pathology and suicide risk. It was designed to
reflect nine psychological symptoms (obsessive-compulsive, somatization,
paranoid ideation, psychoticism, depression, anxiety, hostility,
phobic anxiety, and interpersonal sensitivity) observed in psychiatric
patients. The internal consistency for the scale has been established
(alpha coefficients range from .77 to .90 for the dimension scores).
Test-retest coefficient range from .80 to .90. The SCL-90-R correlates
highly (r "= .88) with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality
Inventory. The SCL-90-R was chosen as the one-time assessment measure
for these depressed women because of the need to eliminate from
the study those who did show symptoms of psychosis, pathology, and
suicidal risk.
Coopersmith's Self-Esteem Inventory.
Coopersmith's Self-Esteem Inventory (Ryden, 1978) is a 58-item self-report
used to measure self-esteem in adult subjects. The test has a test-retest
reliability of .80. Because self-esteem may be related to a person's
depression, Ryden's modification of the Coopersmith's self-esteem
inventory was chosen to measure the subject's self-esteem.
The Young Loneliness Scale.
The Young Loneliness Scale (YLS) (Young, 1981) is a 19-item self-report
inventory used to diagnose the severity of recent loneliness. Test
items assess the client's relationship with friends and close family
members during a given period of time, by rating on a scale of 0
(low) to 3 (high) the frequency, disclosure, caring, and physical
intimacy they experienced in each relationship. Young establishes
cutting scores as 8 to 9 (normal), 10 to 18 (mild), 19 to29 (moderate
to severely), 30 (high), and 50 as a very high degree of loneliness.
The YLS has been tested for reliability and validity with both outpatient,
college, and university populations. In assessing reliability, measures
of consistency obtained with these populations were considered reasonably
high (alpha coefficients ranged from .78 to .84).
Beck Hopelessness Scale. The
Beck Hopelessness Scale (HS) (Beck, 1978) is an instrument that
measures the degree of optimism or pessimism that a subject feels.
Subjects are asked either to agree or disagree with the statements
provided. Low scores (0 to 3) represent relative optimism (or minimal
hopelessness), while high scores (>l5) represent very pessimistic
responses (or severe feelings of hopelessness). A coefficient alpha
estimate of .93 has been reported (Beck et al., 1974).
RESULTS
There were not significant pretreatment differences between the treatment
and control groups on any of the four inventories (all Fs < 1.57),
indicating the randomization procedure was successful. To assess the
effectiveness of the treatment program, a separate repeated measures
analysis of variance was performed on each of the four dependent measures
that included the treatment condition (treatment vs. control) as a
between-subjects factor and time of assessment (pretest, posttest,
and follow-up) as the repeated measure. If our pre-dictions were confirmed,
the repeated measures analyses of variance should reveal a significant
two-way interaction between treatment group and time of assessment.
Table 1 contains the cell means and standard deviations for the four
inventory scores.
Depression
The analysis of the women's BDI responses revealed, as expected,
a significant interaction between treatment condition and time of
assessment, F(l, 32) = 4.67; p < .017). To test whether this
interaction was of the precise nature predicted, the treatment group
and control group BDI scores were analyzed separately using a test
of the simple main effect of the interaction (Keppel, 1973).These
analyses revealed, as predicted, that the women who attended the
sessions reported a significant reduction in their depression level
(F(2,18) = 37.26; p < .001); whereas the women in the control
group reported no significant change in depression level (F(2, 14)
= 3.63, NS). A significant main effect for the time of assessment
(F(2,32) = 27.96; p < .0001) also was found showing an overall
decrease in the women's self-reported level of depression across
time (Ms = 19.61,12.61, and 9.11 for pretest, posttest, and follow-up
respectively). However, this main effect for time is qualified by
the obtained interaction.
Hopelessness
The analysis performed on the Beck HS mean responses revealed, as
predicted, a significant interaction between time of assessment
and treatment condition (F(2, 32) = 8.92; p < .0009). Once again,
separate analyses of the treatment and control group scores revealed,
as predicted, a substantial decrease in the women's feelings of
hopelessness in the treatment group (F(2. 18) = 38.24:p < .001),
whereas no change in feelings of hopelessness was reported by women
in the control condition (F(2, 14) = 2.44, NS). A significant main
effect for time of assessment (F(2, 32) =14.21; p < .0002) was
also found, indicating an overall decrease in the women's reported
feelings of hopelessness across time (Ms = 11.56, 9.00,and 7.22
for pretest, posttest, and follow-up respectively). No main effect
for treatment condition was found (F(2,32) = 1.34, NS).
Self-esteem
Consistent with our predictions, a near-significant interaction
between time of assessment and treatment condition was found (F(2,
32) =2.81; p < .0752). A test of the simple main effects of the
interaction indicated, as expected, a substantial increase in self-esteem
in the treatment group (F(2, 18) = 15.72; p < 0.001), but not
in the control condition (F < 1). The anova performed on the
SEI mean responses also revealed a main effect for time of assessment
(F(2, 32) = 6.81; p< .0035), characterized by an overall increase
in self-esteem across time (Ms = 52.00, 56.10, and 64.78 for pretest,
posttest, and follow-up respectively). No main effect for treatment
condition was found (F(l, 16) = 2.42, NS).
Loneliness
Only the main effect for time of assessment was statistically significant
in the analysis performed on the women's Loneliness Scale mean responses
(F(2. 32} = 7.07; p < 0.003), indicating a decrease in the women's
feelings of loneliness across time (Ms = 15.72, 13.78, and 11.22
for pretest, posttest, and follow-up respectively).
DISCUSSION
The results of this investigation offer strong support for our predictions
that the group treatment sessions are of therapeutic value to depressed
women. Women who attended the group sessions showed a significant
decrease in self-reported depression, a substantial reduction in feelings
of hopelessness, and a significant increase in self-esteem. In addition,
these improvements in the treatment group's psychological well-being
were maintained from the time of the posttest assessment to the 3-year
follow-up assessment. Conversely, women in the no treatment control
group showed no significant change in their psychological well-being
across time.
There may be interesting conjectures as to why this intervention
seemed not only to work, but to be successful over a 3-year period
of time. The authors speculate that Gordon's cognitive-behavioral
intervention model may have positive results for at least, three
reasons. First, the intervention's workbook content seems critically
tailored to the concerns of depressed women. Also, the Facilitator's
Manual reinforces confrontation of group members by the nurses as
well as giving them support. Traditional approaches too often reinforce
the passivity and negative self-image of women. This perpetuates
women's problems rather than resolving them (Weissman & Klerman,
1977). The many strength-building activities provided within the
Women's Workbook may not only have helped group members to learn
and to try new, more appropriate communication skills, because these
skills appear to have endured long after the group was discontinued.
Specific themes relevant to depression, in women were introduced
and emphasized throughout the sessions (e.g., that women are worthwhile
and significant, that people have control over their thoughts and
behavior, that people have choices, that we cannot change others
but only ourselves, etc.). These women group members learned how
to problem solve, build self-esteem and support networks, as well
as how to let go of their guilt, loss, and grief. Women became more
self-aware and independent.
Secondly, the structured nature of the therapy, particularly by
providing the women with work books they could study and refer to
any time, may have been valuable to the women's improvement in psychological
functioning. They tended to become their "own" psychotherapists
and apparently their success generated more success as time went
on. As indicated in Table I, the participants of the treatment group
did not remain at posttesting levels, but continued to improve psychologically
3years after. This was not true of the participants in the control
group.
The third reason for the intervention's success may relate to the
supportive interaction that apparently developed in group between
the women. Observations recorded by the nurses revealed definite
group cohesiveness and a strong positive bond between the group
members. The female nurses were not only role models for these women,
but created a trusting atmosphere that lessened the women's anxiety.
The women group members seemed to learn what they needed in life
to become stable and happy. This insight apparently motivated them
to change their negative thoughts and behaviors.
The investigation obviously has discernible limitations that should
be addressed in future research. The small number of participants
in this study and the use of only a no-treatment control group,
with no comparison-treatment group, requires that replication studies
be conducted. However, it is important to note that highly significant
differences between the treatment and control groups were found
even with the small number of subjects. In the future, additional
measures of depression such as DSM-III criteria, and additional
measures of specific components of depressive symptomatology should
be assessed. Further, future studies should address more specifically
whether the obtained improvement in psychological well-being is
differentiated related to specific aspects of the cognitive-behavioral
intervention. However, the results of this investigation do provide
convergent evidence that the cognitive-behavioral intervention was
effective. And the investigation does point to the success of cognitive-behavioral
group therapies at reducing depression.
|
| References
Back, K.W., & Taylor, R. (1976). Self-help groups:
Tool or symbol? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12.295-309.
Bardwick, J.M. (1978). Middle age and a sense of future. Merrill-Palmer
Quarterly, 24, 130-136.
Beck, A.T. (1972). Measuring depression: (the depression inventory.
In T.A. Williams, M.N. Katz, & J.A. Shield (Eds.). Recent
Advances in the Psychobiology of the Depressive Illnesses. Government
Printing Office,Washington, D.C.
Beck, A.T., (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders.
New York: International Universities Press.
Beck, A.T.,(1978). Depression: Causes and Treatment, (pp.12-43.
186-207). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Beck, A.T., & Beamesderfer, A. (1974). Assessment of depression,
the depression inventories. In P. Pichot (Ed.), Psychological
Measurements in Psychopharmacology and Modern Pharmacopsychiatry.
Basel, Switzerland: Kerger.
Beck, A.T., Ruth. A.J., Shaw. B.F., & Emery, G. 1979). Cognitive
therapy of depression. New York: Guilford
Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., &. Erbaugh,
J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of
General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.
Beck, A.T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974).
The measurement of pessimism: The hopelessness scale. Journal
of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 861-865.
Brown, G.W., Bhrolchain, M.N., & Harris, T. (1975). Social
class and psychiatric disturbance among women in an urban population.
Sociology, 9, 225-254.
Caner, C.A. (1971). Advantages of being a woman therapist. Psychotherapy:
Theory Research and Practice, 8, 297-300.
Chenitz, W.C. (1979). Primary depression in older women: Are current
theories and treatment of depression relevant to this age group?
Journal of Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health Services,
8, 17-23.
Chodoff, P. (1972). The depressive personality. Archives of
General Psychiatry, 27. 666-673.
Claerhout, S., Elder, J., & Carolyn, J. (1982). Problem-solving
skills of rural battered women. American Journal of Community Psychology,
10(5), 605-606.
Curlee, J. (1969). Alcoholism and the 'empty nest'. Bulletin
of Menninger Clinic, 33, 165-170.
Davis, S.M. (1977). Women's liberation groups as a primary preventive
mental health strategy. Community Mental Health Journal,
13, 219-228.
Derogatis, L. (1976). SCL-90 (Revised Version) Manual-1.
Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Derogatis, L.R., Rickels, K., &. Roche, A. F. (1976). The SCL-90
and the MMPI: A step in the validation of a new self-report scale.
British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 280-289.
Dinnauer, L., Miller, M., & Frankforter, M. (1981). Implementation
strategies for an inpatient woman's support group. Journal of
Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health Services, 19, 13-16.
Dohrenwend, B.S. (1973). Social status and stressful life events.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25. 225-235.
Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. NewYork:
Lyle Stewart.
Emery, G. (1981). A new beginning: How you can change your life
through cognitive therapy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Fagin, C.M. (1983). Concepts for the future: Competition and substitution.
Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services,
21(2). 36-40.
Fiske, D.W., Hunt, H.F., Luborsky, L., Orne, T.M., Parloff, M.B.,
Reiser, M.F., & Tuma, A.H. (1970). Planning of research on effectiveness
of psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 22, 22.
Ginsburg, F., & Marks, I. (1977). Costs of benefits of behavioral
psychotherapy. Psychological Medicine, 7, 685-700.
Goldberg, A. (1973) Psychotherapy of narcissistic injuries. Archives
of General Psychiatry, 28, 722-726.
Gordon, V. (1982). Themes and cohesiveness observed in a depressed
women's support group. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 4,
115-125.
Gordon, V. (1986). Treatment of depressed women by nurses in Great
Britain and the U.S.A. In J. Brooking (Ed.), Psychiatric nursing
research (Vol. 3. pp. 91-118). London: Wiley.
Gordon, V., & Gordon, E. (1987). Short-term group treatment
of depressed women: A replication study in Great Britain. Archives
of Psychiatric Nursing. 2(1), 111-124.
Gordon, V., & Ledray, L. (1985). Depression in women: The challenge
of treatment and prevention. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing
and Mental Health Services, 23(1),26-33.
Gordon, V., &. Ledray, L. (1986). Growth-support intervention
for the treatment of depression in women of middle years. Western
Journal of Nursing Research, 8(3), 263-283.
Gove, W. (1972). The relationship between sex roles, mental illness
and marital status. Social Forces, 51, 34-44.
Greenglass, E.R. (1985). A social-psychological view of marriage
for women. International Journal of Women's Studies, 8(l),
24-31.
Guttentag, M., Salasin, S., & Belle, D, (1980). The mental
health of women. New York: Academic.
Hall, L.A., Williams, C.A., &. Greenberg, R.S. (1985). Supports,
Stressors, & depressive symptoms in low income mothers of young
children. American Journal of Public Health, 75, 518-522.
Hardin, S.B., & Durham, J.D. (1985. May). First-rate. Journal
of Psychosocial Nursing, 23(5), 9-15.
Hirschfeld, R.M. (1980). Elation and despair. In M. Scarf (Ed.),
Unfinished business: Pressure points in the lives of women.
New York: Ballantine.
Hirschfeld, R.M., & Cross, C (1982). Epidemiology of affective
disorders: Psychosocial risk factors. Archives General Psychiatry,
39, 35-46.
Horney, K (1967). Feminine psychology. New York: Norton.
Houseknecht, S.K., Vaughan, S., & Macke, A.S. (1984. February).
Marital disruption among professional women: The timing of career
and family events. Social Problems, 31(3), 273-284.
Kagan, J., & Moss. H.A. (1971). Birth to maturity. In J.M.Bardwick
(Ed.), Psychology of women. New York:Harper and Row.
Kaslow, S. (1982). Marriage and intimacy: The surprising staying
power of loveless marriages. Ladies Home Journal, 3, 41-48.
Katz, D.W. (1985). Sex discrimination in hiring: The influence
of organizational climate and need for approval and decision making
behavior. (Abstract No. DA8412598), Adelphi University. The Institute
of Advanced Studies.
Kearney, D.A. (1982). Intimacy as a factor in depression among
women. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Georgia. Athens. GA. University
Microfilms International, Ann Arbor. MI:8225203. p. 44.
Keppel, G. (1973). Design and analysis: A researcher's hand-book.
Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kivett, V.R. (1979). Religious motivation in middle age: Correlates
and implications. Journal of Gerontology, 34,106-115.
Klerman, G., Weissman, M., Rounsaville, B., & Chevan, E. (1984).
Interpersonal psychotherapy of depression. New York: Basic
Books.
Krause, N., & Geyer-Pestello, H.F. (1985) Depressive symptoms
among women employed outside the home. American Journal of Community
Psychology,13, 49-67.
Ledray, L., & Chaignot, M. (1980). Services to sexual assault
victims in Hennepin County. Evaluation and Change,Special
issue, 131-134.
Lewinsohn, P., Sullivan, J., & Grosscup, S. (1982). Behavioral
therapy: Clinical applications. In A.J. Rush (Ed.), Short-Term
Psychotherapies of Depression. New York:Guilford, pp. 50-87.
Light, H. (1984). Differences in employed women's anxiety, depression,
and hostility level according to their career and family role commitment.
Psychological Reports,. 55, 290.
Lobel, B., & Hirschfeld, R (1985). Depression. What we know.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIMH, Rockville, MD
DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 85-1318.
Lowenthal, M.F., & Chiriboga, D. (1972). Transition to the
empty nest: Crisis, challenge or relief? Archives of General
Psychiatry, 26, 8-14.
Marks, I. (1977). Recent results of behavioral therapy of phobias
and obsessions. Journal of International Medical Research,
5(5), 16-21.
Maykowsky, V.P. (1980). Stress and mental health of women: A discussion
of research and issues. In M. Guttentag (Ed.), The mental health
of women. New York: Academic.
McLachlan, J.F., Walderman, R.L., Birchmore, D.F., & Marsden,
L.R. (1976). Self-evaluation, role satisfaction in the woman alcoholic.
The International Journal of Addictions. I4(b), 809-832.
McVicar, P., & Herman, A. (1983). Assertiveness, self-actualization,
and locus of control in women. Sex Roles. 9(4), 555-562.
Merikangas, K., Prusoff, B., Kupfer, D., & Frank, E. (1986).
Marital adjustment in major depression. Journal of Affective
Disorders. 9, 5-11.
Miller, J. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston:
Beacon Press.
Notman, M. (1979). Midlife concerns in women: Implications of the
menopause. American Journal of Psychiatry. 136, 1270-1274.
Notman, M.T., Nadelson, C.C., & Bennett, M.B. (1978). Achievement
conflict in women. Psychother, Psychosom., 29. 203-213.
Parloff, M.B. (1980). Psychotherapy and research: An anaclitic
depression. Psychiatry, 43. 280.
Radloff, L.S. (1975). Sex differences in depression: The effects
of occupation and marital status. Sex Roles, 1, 249-265.
Rush, A.J. (1982). Short-term psychotherapies for depression.
New York: Guilford.
Ryden, M. (1978). Coopersmith self-esteem inventory (adult version).
Psychological Reports, 43, 1189-1190.
Schaef, A.W. (1981). Women's reality. Minneapolis: Winston.
Schwab. J.J., Bralow, M., & Holzer, C. (1967). A comparison
of two rating scales for depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology,
23, 94-96.
Seligman, M.E. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.
Shaw, B.F. (1977). Comparison of cognitive therapy and behavior
therapy in the treatment of depression. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology, 45, 543-551.
Sorenson, D. (2003). Healing traumatizing provider interactions among women through short-term group therapy, Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 17, (6), 259-269.
Tinsley, E.G., Sullivan-Guest, S., & McGuire, J. (1984). Feminine
sex role and depression in middle-aged women. Sex Roles,
II, 25-32.
Tucker, S.J. (1977). The menopause: How much soma and how much
psyche? JOCN Nursing, 6, 40-47.
Twin Cities Community Program for Affordable Health Care. (1984).
Ambulatory and Transitional Care Project. Health Association Center,
221 University Avenue S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55414.
Usher, S., & Fels, M. (1985). The challenge of feminism and
career for the middle-aged woman. International Journal of Women's
Studies, 8(1), 47-57.
van Keep, P., & Prill, H. (1975). Psychosociology of menopause
and post-menopause. Frontiers in Hormone Research,. 3, 32-39.
van Servellen, G., & Dull, L. (1981). Group psychotherapy for
depressed women: A model. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing and
Mental Health Services, 19, 25-30.
Vemura, M.A., Young, D.E., Feldman, M.J., Pastore, P., Pikula,
S., & Yates, M.A. (1985). Cost savings as an indicator of successful
nursing intervention. Nursing Research, J4(l), 50-53.
Walker, L.E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper
and Row.
Weissman, M. (1981). Women: The major victims of depression. Medical
Times, 109( I), 24-36.
Weissman, M., & Klerman, G. (1977). Sex differences and the
epidemiology of depression. Archives of General Psychiatry,
34, 98-109.
Wood, H.P., & Duffy, E.L. (1966). Psychological factors in
alcoholic women. American Journal of Psychiatry, 123(3),
341.345.
Young, S.E. (1981). Cognitive therapy and loneliness. In G. Emery,
S. Hollon, & R. Bedrosian (Eds.). New Directions in Cognitive
Therapy (pp. 39.159). New York: Guilford.
|