A 3-Year Follow-Up of a Cognitive-Behavioral
Therapy Intervention


Verona C. Gordon, Alana K. Matwychuk,
Elizabeth Gordon Sachs, and Brenda H. Canedy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral intervention designed to reduce depression in women. Women were randomly assigned to either a no-treatment control group or a treatment group. Assessment was performed immediately before and after the treatment sessions and 3 years later. As predicted, the treatment group was found to have significantly lower levels of depression and hopelessness, and significantly higher levels of self-esteem than the no-treatment control group. These differences were maintained from the time of the posttreatment assessment to the follow-up assessment.
© 1988 by Grune & Stratton, Inc.
see references

OF MAJOR CONCERN to health care professionals on both national and international levels is the soaring cost of health care. Of related and perhaps equal consequence in the area of psychiatry is the need to provide treatments that last. The well-known "revolving door" syndrome of the early returning discharged psychiatric patient back to the hospital has been discouraging to psychiatric staff as well as to the public. Unfortunately, there appears to be a paucity of research studies conducted to alleviate this expensive problem.

This paper will describe a nursing intervention that continues to be effective over a 3-year period of time after the therapy was discontinued. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention based on a holistic health framework facilitated by two psychiatric nurses to reduce depression in women. That this approach may provide an efficient alternative to traditional psychotherapy or psychiatric hospitalization for depressed women is the aim of the intervention model. More specifically, it reports on the effectiveness of short-term group therapy for depressed women completed in England in 1983 with a follow-up study in 1986. Two pilot studies, using pretest-posttest designs, were previously conducted in the midwestern United States (Gordon, 1982; Gordon& Ledray, 1986). This study was conducted in England because of a generous invitation to Verona Gordon by the faculty at the Department of Nursing Studies, Chelsea College, University of London, and the investigator's previous positive experiences with nurses there.

The present paper has two major goals: (a) to describe the long-term outcome of individuals who have completed a cognitive-behavioral treatment group for depression, and (b) to assess the relative improvement in psychological well-being of depressed individuals who participated in a treatment group as compared with a no-treatment control group. Previous research reports by Gordon (Gordon. 1986: Gordon & Gordon. 1987) provide support for the hypothesis that the group intervention used in the present investigation is of therapeutic value to depressed women, at least when their depression level is reassessed immediately after treatment

DEPRESSION - AN INTERNATIONAL PROBLEM

Weissman's (1981) review of 40 years of depression-related research in 30 western countries determined that, although depression affects both men and women, it is more common in women and affects them in their most youthful productive years-most frequently occurring among married women with children. In the United States, for example, more than 40 million people suffer from depression, and two thirds of these people are women (Hirschfeld, 1980). And studies by Guttentag, Salasin, & Belle (1980) at Harvard indicate that there was a rapid increase in the United States of the number of females of all ages and classes afflicted with depression. Eminent researchers (Dohrenwend, 1973; van Keep & Prill, 1975; Tucker, 1977; Notman, 1979) have suggested that stressors occurring in women's daily lives that stem from personal, family, social, and cultural demands upon them may result in their depression. Yet, little systematic research has evaluated the female preponderance for depression (Lobel & Hirschfeld, 1985; Hirschfeld & Cross, 1982). Women do seek counseling; however, there have been few convincing research studies on the effectiveness of various attempted psychotherapies (Fiske et al., 1970). Also, because of the rising high cost of health care, funding agencies insist that treatment approaches in mental health be efficacious, safe, and cost-effective (Parloff, 1980).

Thus, examining the phenomenon of depression and formulating and implementing intervention that effectively addresses the diverse concerns and needs of depressed women, remains a challenge to nurse researchers. The social morbidity of depression is high. It impairs social and occupational functioning--most markedly affecting work performance and the intimate relationships of marriage and parenthood. Depression manifests itself in diminished personal satisfaction, difficulty in communication, increased dependency, anger, and tension, especially with the spouse and children. Further, it has a particularly devastating impact upon a woman's capacity to care for her children (Klerman, Weissman, Rounsaville, & Chevan, 1984).

Three possible psychological explanations for these escalating rates of depression in women have been suggested and described by the theories of (a) Lewinsohn's behavioral model, (b) Seligman's learned helplessness model, and (c) Beck's cognitive model.

RATIONALE FOR A GROUP INTERVENTION

The apparent centrality of psychosocial factors to depression in women suggests that much might be done through early identification and treatment of symptoms through psychotherapeutic intervention. Once women have been identified, groups can be established. At minimal expense, these groups may provide the support necessary to develop and establish successful coping strategies for women while preventing more serious depression (Gordon & Ledray, 1985).

A group approach can be far superior to individual treatment for women in that it contact with peers who are likely to be dealing with some of the same allows life problems (Maykowsky, 1980). Coping strategies can be tested and shared within the supportive, safe environment of a group. For instance, groups have been recognized as especially important in helping to lower the group members' acknowledged sense of helplessness and powerlessness and their feelings of isolation (Davis. 1977). Further, van Servellen and Dull (1981) have demonstrated group therapy as an effective medium to promote positive change in self-esteem of depressed women. Dinnauer. Miller. & Frankforter (1981) emphasize the strength of groups as providing an important structure for women's social learning. In fact. Back and Taylor (1976) assert that the value of group intervention can go far beyond its original purpose and provides the individuals with a sense of community.

In addition, groups tend to be more cost effective than individual psychotherapy (Ventura et al.. 1985). The lowering of the financial costs of therapy for depressed women in groups facilitated by nurses can be phenomenal. Research by Marks (1977), Ginsberg & Marks (1977), Carter (1971), and Fagin (1983) suggests that nurses can deliver psychotherapy services to consumers both effectively and economically (Hardin & Durham, 1985). Although the subjects in this longitudinal investigation and in the two previous pilot studies were not charged fees, this reported nurse-directed cognitive therapy has been estimated to be a cost savings of up to 74% per person (Twin Cities Community Program for Affordable Health Care, 1984). This cost-saving comparison is made between the depressed woman attending the reported nurses' groups or her attending inpatient and/or office-based group sessions led by a psychologist or psychiatrist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Recruitment and Screening of Participants
Depressed women were solicited from the London area by a public service radio broadcast (BBC) in 1983 to participate in a research project. Screening of participants was conducted in three stages. Preliminary screening took place during the radio broadcast. The announcement indicated that in order to be eligible for participation in the study, an individual had to be a depressed woman who was not at present seeing a counselor or psychiatrist and did speak English. Interested individuals who phoned and fit the initial criteria (n =119) were scheduled to take the written screening measures that included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), (Beck et al., 1961) and the SCL-90-R (Derogatis, 1976). Volunteers who met the following criteria were selected as eligible for participation in the study: a BDI score of at least 14 and scores within "normal" limits on the SCL-90-R (not psychotic, psychopathic, or suicidal). From the 81 potential participants who passed the written screening criteria. 20 women were randomly selected to participate in the investigation. Of the 20 selected subjects, all women were white and upper middle class, with a mean age of 51 years. Eight women were married and had children, while one was divorced, five were separated, four were single, and two were widowed. Twelve women were working, one was unemployed, and seven were homemakers.


TREATMENT AND MEASUREMENT SESSIONS

Before the initial session, all participants were administered the BDI (Beck, 1972), the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Ryden, 1978), the Beck Hopelessness Scale (Rush. 1982), and the Young Loneliness Scale (Young. 1981). Then the participants were assigned randomly to either the treatment group or the no-treatment control group. Participants in the control group {n = 10) received no intervention and were asked to refrain from joining other therapy groups or seeking counseling while the study was going on unless necessary. None of the control group participants sought treatment for depression. Demographic differences between the experimental and control groups appeared incidental regarding age, marital status, working full-time or part-time. In addition, at the time of the initial session, the treatment and control groups did not differ significantly in their levels of depression, self-esteem, hopelessness, or loneliness.

Participants in the treatment group (n = 10) attended 14 weekly (two-hour) group sessions facilitated by two psychiatric nurses, both trained and experienced in behavioral and cognitive therapy. The treatment was an application of the cognitive-behavioral structured group approach based on the Gordon model as explicated in two workbooks (Facilitator's Manual and Women's Workbook). The two nurse facilitators were provided with a Facilitator's Manual that included information on group dynamics, reinforcement theory, and evaluation of group processes. Included in the manuals were specific lecture content, objectives, and discussion questions for each of the 14 group sessions. Each nurse also recorded her observations of the session after each group was over.
The women in the treatment group met for two hours weekly at Chelsea College, University of London. The treatment group sessions consisted of one hour of lecture, education, and discussion, and a second hour devoted to specific activities related to issues addressed by that particular session. Each subject in the treatment group was provided with a Women's Workbook and was expected to come to the group sessions with the assigned homework completed. Weekly topics included goal setting. feelings and depression, cognitions and feelings, self-worth, relationships, communication skills, assertiveness, conflict management, decision making, stress, relaxation, exercise, nutrition, menstruation/menopause, and strength building.
Application of Beck's cognitive theory aided group members to become more aware of their negative thoughts and behavior. These women became aware of their defense mechanisms and learned more effective coping skills, eliminating negative defenses. Positive reinforcement (Lewinsohn's behavioral theory) was given for attitudinal and behavioral changes in group members. Seligman's learned helplessness theory was helpful to the depressed women in gaining insight into their dependency and learning more appropriate communication skills to enhance their self-esteem. A more detailed description of the treatment procedure and evidence of its efficacy is presented in Gordon (1986).

Immediately after the 14th session of the treatment group, all 20 participants were readministered the inventories they had taken before the first session. In June 1986, 36 months after the final treatment session, the participants in the treatment and control groups were contacted by mail and asked to complete the four inventories again. Of the potential population of 20 participants, 18 (n = 10 and n = 8 for the treatment and the control group respectively) were contacted and agreed to take part in the follow-up. Two participants could not be contacted.


INSTRUMENTS USED IN THE STUDY

BDI. (Beck. 1978) is a 21-item self-report measure (range = 0 to 63) used to measure level of depression. The internal consistency and validity of this widely use instrument has been well documented (Beck & Beamesderfer, 1974; Shaw, 1977). The test-retest stability is high (r's = .86 to .93) and the measure appears sensitive to spontaneous or treatment related change (Beck, 1972). Also, the relationship between the BDI and other indices of depression such as Hamilton's Rating Scale is strong (e.g.. correlation coefficient of .75; Schwab, Bralow, & Holzec. 1967).

The SCL-90-R Inventory. The SCL-90-R Inventory (Derogatis. 1976) is a 90-item self-report measure used to screen for pathology and suicide risk. It was designed to reflect nine psychological symptoms (obsessive-compulsive, somatization, paranoid ideation, psychoticism, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, and interpersonal sensitivity) observed in psychiatric patients. The internal consistency for the scale has been established (alpha coefficients range from .77 to .90 for the dimension scores). Test-retest coefficient range from .80 to .90. The SCL-90-R correlates highly (r "= .88) with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. The SCL-90-R was chosen as the one-time assessment measure for these depressed women because of the need to eliminate from the study those who did show symptoms of psychosis, pathology, and suicidal risk.

Coopersmith's Self-Esteem Inventory. Coopersmith's Self-Esteem Inventory (Ryden, 1978) is a 58-item self-report used to measure self-esteem in adult subjects. The test has a test-retest reliability of .80. Because self-esteem may be related to a person's depression, Ryden's modification of the Coopersmith's self-esteem inventory was chosen to measure the subject's self-esteem.

The Young Loneliness Scale. The Young Loneliness Scale (YLS) (Young, 1981) is a 19-item self-report inventory used to diagnose the severity of recent loneliness. Test items assess the client's relationship with friends and close family members during a given period of time, by rating on a scale of 0 (low) to 3 (high) the frequency, disclosure, caring, and physical intimacy they experienced in each relationship. Young establishes cutting scores as 8 to 9 (normal), 10 to 18 (mild), 19 to29 (moderate to severely), 30 (high), and 50 as a very high degree of loneliness. The YLS has been tested for reliability and validity with both outpatient, college, and university populations. In assessing reliability, measures of consistency obtained with these populations were considered reasonably high (alpha coefficients ranged from .78 to .84).

Beck Hopelessness Scale. The Beck Hopelessness Scale (HS) (Beck, 1978) is an instrument that measures the degree of optimism or pessimism that a subject feels. Subjects are asked either to agree or disagree with the statements provided. Low scores (0 to 3) represent relative optimism (or minimal hopelessness), while high scores (>l5) represent very pessimistic responses (or severe feelings of hopelessness). A coefficient alpha estimate of .93 has been reported (Beck et al., 1974).

RESULTS

There were not significant pretreatment differences between the treatment and control groups on any of the four inventories (all Fs < 1.57), indicating the randomization procedure was successful. To assess the effectiveness of the treatment program, a separate repeated measures analysis of variance was performed on each of the four dependent measures that included the treatment condition (treatment vs. control) as a between-subjects factor and time of assessment (pretest, posttest, and follow-up) as the repeated measure. If our pre-dictions were confirmed, the repeated measures analyses of variance should reveal a significant two-way interaction between treatment group and time of assessment. Table 1 contains the cell means and standard deviations for the four inventory scores.

Depression
The analysis of the women's BDI responses revealed, as expected, a significant interaction between treatment condition and time of assessment, F(l, 32) = 4.67; p < .017). To test whether this interaction was of the precise nature predicted, the treatment group and control group BDI scores were analyzed separately using a test of the simple main effect of the interaction (Keppel, 1973).These analyses revealed, as predicted, that the women who attended the sessions reported a significant reduction in their depression level (F(2,18) = 37.26; p < .001); whereas the women in the control group reported no significant change in depression level (F(2, 14) = 3.63, NS). A significant main effect for the time of assessment (F(2,32) = 27.96; p < .0001) also was found showing an overall decrease in the women's self-reported level of depression across time (Ms = 19.61,12.61, and 9.11 for pretest, posttest, and follow-up respectively). However, this main effect for time is qualified by the obtained interaction.

Hopelessness
The analysis performed on the Beck HS mean responses revealed, as predicted, a significant interaction between time of assessment and treatment condition (F(2, 32) = 8.92; p < .0009). Once again, separate analyses of the treatment and control group scores revealed, as predicted, a substantial decrease in the women's feelings of hopelessness in the treatment group (F(2. 18) = 38.24:p < .001), whereas no change in feelings of hopelessness was reported by women in the control condition (F(2, 14) = 2.44, NS). A significant main effect for time of assessment (F(2, 32) =14.21; p < .0002) was also found, indicating an overall decrease in the women's reported feelings of hopelessness across time (Ms = 11.56, 9.00,and 7.22 for pretest, posttest, and follow-up respectively). No main effect for treatment condition was found (F(2,32) = 1.34, NS).

Self-esteem
Consistent with our predictions, a near-significant interaction between time of assessment and treatment condition was found (F(2, 32) =2.81; p < .0752). A test of the simple main effects of the interaction indicated, as expected, a substantial increase in self-esteem in the treatment group (F(2, 18) = 15.72; p < 0.001), but not in the control condition (F < 1). The anova performed on the SEI mean responses also revealed a main effect for time of assessment (F(2, 32) = 6.81; p< .0035), characterized by an overall increase in self-esteem across time (Ms = 52.00, 56.10, and 64.78 for pretest, posttest, and follow-up respectively). No main effect for treatment condition was found (F(l, 16) = 2.42, NS).

Loneliness
Only the main effect for time of assessment was statistically significant in the analysis performed on the women's Loneliness Scale mean responses (F(2. 32} = 7.07; p < 0.003), indicating a decrease in the women's feelings of loneliness across time (Ms = 15.72, 13.78, and 11.22 for pretest, posttest, and follow-up respectively).

DISCUSSION

The results of this investigation offer strong support for our predictions that the group treatment sessions are of therapeutic value to depressed women. Women who attended the group sessions showed a significant decrease in self-reported depression, a substantial reduction in feelings of hopelessness, and a significant increase in self-esteem. In addition, these improvements in the treatment group's psychological well-being were maintained from the time of the posttest assessment to the 3-year follow-up assessment. Conversely, women in the no treatment control group showed no significant change in their psychological well-being across time.

There may be interesting conjectures as to why this intervention seemed not only to work, but to be successful over a 3-year period of time. The authors speculate that Gordon's cognitive-behavioral intervention model may have positive results for at least, three reasons. First, the intervention's workbook content seems critically tailored to the concerns of depressed women. Also, the Facilitator's Manual reinforces confrontation of group members by the nurses as well as giving them support. Traditional approaches too often reinforce the passivity and negative self-image of women. This perpetuates women's problems rather than resolving them (Weissman & Klerman, 1977). The many strength-building activities provided within the Women's Workbook may not only have helped group members to learn and to try new, more appropriate communication skills, because these skills appear to have endured long after the group was discontinued. Specific themes relevant to depression, in women were introduced and emphasized throughout the sessions (e.g., that women are worthwhile and significant, that people have control over their thoughts and behavior, that people have choices, that we cannot change others but only ourselves, etc.). These women group members learned how to problem solve, build self-esteem and support networks, as well as how to let go of their guilt, loss, and grief. Women became more self-aware and independent.

Secondly, the structured nature of the therapy, particularly by providing the women with work books they could study and refer to any time, may have been valuable to the women's improvement in psychological functioning. They tended to become their "own" psychotherapists and apparently their success generated more success as time went on. As indicated in Table I, the participants of the treatment group did not remain at posttesting levels, but continued to improve psychologically 3years after. This was not true of the participants in the control group.

The third reason for the intervention's success may relate to the supportive interaction that apparently developed in group between the women. Observations recorded by the nurses revealed definite group cohesiveness and a strong positive bond between the group members. The female nurses were not only role models for these women, but created a trusting atmosphere that lessened the women's anxiety. The women group members seemed to learn what they needed in life to become stable and happy. This insight apparently motivated them to change their negative thoughts and behaviors.

The investigation obviously has discernible limitations that should be addressed in future research. The small number of participants in this study and the use of only a no-treatment control group, with no comparison-treatment group, requires that replication studies be conducted. However, it is important to note that highly significant differences between the treatment and control groups were found even with the small number of subjects. In the future, additional measures of depression such as DSM-III criteria, and additional measures of specific components of depressive symptomatology should be assessed. Further, future studies should address more specifically whether the obtained improvement in psychological well-being is differentiated related to specific aspects of the cognitive-behavioral intervention. However, the results of this investigation do provide convergent evidence that the cognitive-behavioral intervention was effective. And the investigation does point to the success of cognitive-behavioral group therapies at reducing depression.

References

Back, K.W., & Taylor, R. (1976). Self-help groups: Tool or symbol? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12.295-309.

Bardwick, J.M. (1978). Middle age and a sense of future. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 24, 130-136.

Beck, A.T. (1972). Measuring depression: (the depression inventory. In T.A. Williams, M.N. Katz, & J.A. Shield (Eds.). Recent Advances in the Psychobiology of the Depressive Illnesses. Government Printing Office,Washington, D.C.

Beck, A.T., (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

Beck, A.T.,(1978). Depression: Causes and Treatment, (pp.12-43. 186-207). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Beck, A.T., & Beamesderfer, A. (1974). Assessment of depression, the depression inventories. In P. Pichot (Ed.), Psychological Measurements in Psychopharmacology and Modern Pharmacopsychiatry. Basel, Switzerland: Kerger.

Beck, A.T., Ruth. A.J., Shaw. B.F., & Emery, G. 1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford

Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., &. Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.

Beck, A.T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The hopelessness scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 861-865.

Brown, G.W., Bhrolchain, M.N., & Harris, T. (1975). Social class and psychiatric disturbance among women in an urban population. Sociology, 9, 225-254.

Caner, C.A. (1971). Advantages of being a woman therapist. Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice, 8, 297-300.

Chenitz, W.C. (1979). Primary depression in older women: Are current theories and treatment of depression relevant to this age group? Journal of Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health Services, 8, 17-23.

Chodoff, P. (1972). The depressive personality. Archives of General Psychiatry, 27. 666-673.

Claerhout, S., Elder, J., & Carolyn, J. (1982). Problem-solving skills of rural battered women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10(5), 605-606.

Curlee, J. (1969). Alcoholism and the 'empty nest'. Bulletin of Menninger Clinic, 33, 165-170.

Davis, S.M. (1977). Women's liberation groups as a primary preventive mental health strategy. Community Mental Health Journal, 13, 219-228.

Derogatis, L. (1976). SCL-90 (Revised Version) Manual-1. Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Derogatis, L.R., Rickels, K., &. Roche, A. F. (1976). The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A step in the validation of a new self-report scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 280-289.

Dinnauer, L., Miller, M., & Frankforter, M. (1981). Implementation strategies for an inpatient woman's support group. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health Services, 19, 13-16.

Dohrenwend, B.S. (1973). Social status and stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25. 225-235.

Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. NewYork: Lyle Stewart.

Emery, G. (1981). A new beginning: How you can change your life through cognitive therapy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Fagin, C.M. (1983). Concepts for the future: Competition and substitution. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 21(2). 36-40.

Fiske, D.W., Hunt, H.F., Luborsky, L., Orne, T.M., Parloff, M.B., Reiser, M.F., & Tuma, A.H. (1970). Planning of research on effectiveness of psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 22, 22.

Ginsburg, F., & Marks, I. (1977). Costs of benefits of behavioral psychotherapy. Psychological Medicine, 7, 685-700.

Goldberg, A. (1973) Psychotherapy of narcissistic injuries. Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, 722-726.

Gordon, V. (1982). Themes and cohesiveness observed in a depressed women's support group. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 4, 115-125.

Gordon, V. (1986). Treatment of depressed women by nurses in Great Britain and the U.S.A. In J. Brooking (Ed.), Psychiatric nursing research (Vol. 3. pp. 91-118). London: Wiley.

Gordon, V., & Gordon, E. (1987). Short-term group treatment of depressed women: A replication study in Great Britain. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2(1), 111-124.

Gordon, V., & Ledray, L. (1985). Depression in women: The challenge of treatment and prevention. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 23(1),26-33.

Gordon, V., &. Ledray, L. (1986). Growth-support intervention for the treatment of depression in women of middle years. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 8(3), 263-283.

Gove, W. (1972). The relationship between sex roles, mental illness and marital status. Social Forces, 51, 34-44.

Greenglass, E.R. (1985). A social-psychological view of marriage for women. International Journal of Women's Studies, 8(l), 24-31.

Guttentag, M., Salasin, S., & Belle, D, (1980). The mental health of women. New York: Academic.

Hall, L.A., Williams, C.A., &. Greenberg, R.S. (1985). Supports, Stressors, & depressive symptoms in low income mothers of young children. American Journal of Public Health, 75, 518-522.

Hardin, S.B., & Durham, J.D. (1985. May). First-rate. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 23(5), 9-15.

Hirschfeld, R.M. (1980). Elation and despair. In M. Scarf (Ed.), Unfinished business: Pressure points in the lives of women. New York: Ballantine.

Hirschfeld, R.M., & Cross, C (1982). Epidemiology of affective disorders: Psychosocial risk factors. Archives General Psychiatry, 39, 35-46.

Horney, K (1967). Feminine psychology. New York: Norton.

Houseknecht, S.K., Vaughan, S., & Macke, A.S. (1984. February). Marital disruption among professional women: The timing of career and family events. Social Problems, 31(3), 273-284.

Kagan, J., & Moss. H.A. (1971). Birth to maturity. In J.M.Bardwick (Ed.), Psychology of women. New York:Harper and Row.

Kaslow, S. (1982). Marriage and intimacy: The surprising staying power of loveless marriages. Ladies Home Journal, 3, 41-48.

Katz, D.W. (1985). Sex discrimination in hiring: The influence of organizational climate and need for approval and decision making behavior. (Abstract No. DA8412598), Adelphi University. The Institute of Advanced Studies.

Kearney, D.A. (1982). Intimacy as a factor in depression among women. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Georgia. Athens. GA. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor. MI:8225203. p. 44.

Keppel, G. (1973). Design and analysis: A researcher's hand-book. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kivett, V.R. (1979). Religious motivation in middle age: Correlates and implications. Journal of Gerontology, 34,106-115.

Klerman, G., Weissman, M., Rounsaville, B., & Chevan, E. (1984). Interpersonal psychotherapy of depression. New York: Basic Books.

Krause, N., & Geyer-Pestello, H.F. (1985) Depressive symptoms among women employed outside the home. American Journal of Community Psychology,13, 49-67.

Ledray, L., & Chaignot, M. (1980). Services to sexual assault victims in Hennepin County. Evaluation and Change,Special issue, 131-134.

Lewinsohn, P., Sullivan, J., & Grosscup, S. (1982). Behavioral therapy: Clinical applications. In A.J. Rush (Ed.), Short-Term Psychotherapies of Depression. New York:Guilford, pp. 50-87.

Light, H. (1984). Differences in employed women's anxiety, depression, and hostility level according to their career and family role commitment. Psychological Reports,. 55, 290.

Lobel, B., & Hirschfeld, R (1985). Depression. What we know. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIMH, Rockville, MD DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 85-1318.

Lowenthal, M.F., & Chiriboga, D. (1972). Transition to the empty nest: Crisis, challenge or relief? Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 8-14.

Marks, I. (1977). Recent results of behavioral therapy of phobias and obsessions. Journal of International Medical Research, 5(5), 16-21.

Maykowsky, V.P. (1980). Stress and mental health of women: A discussion of research and issues. In M. Guttentag (Ed.), The mental health of women. New York: Academic.

McLachlan, J.F., Walderman, R.L., Birchmore, D.F., & Marsden, L.R. (1976). Self-evaluation, role satisfaction in the woman alcoholic. The International Journal of Addictions. I4(b), 809-832.

McVicar, P., & Herman, A. (1983). Assertiveness, self-actualization, and locus of control in women. Sex Roles. 9(4), 555-562.

Merikangas, K., Prusoff, B., Kupfer, D., & Frank, E. (1986). Marital adjustment in major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 9, 5-11.

Miller, J. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.

Notman, M. (1979). Midlife concerns in women: Implications of the menopause. American Journal of Psychiatry. 136, 1270-1274.

Notman, M.T., Nadelson, C.C., & Bennett, M.B. (1978). Achievement conflict in women. Psychother, Psychosom., 29. 203-213.

Parloff, M.B. (1980). Psychotherapy and research: An anaclitic depression. Psychiatry, 43. 280.

Radloff, L.S. (1975). Sex differences in depression: The effects of occupation and marital status. Sex Roles, 1, 249-265.

Rush, A.J. (1982). Short-term psychotherapies for depression. New York: Guilford.

Ryden, M. (1978). Coopersmith self-esteem inventory (adult version). Psychological Reports, 43, 1189-1190.

Schaef, A.W. (1981). Women's reality. Minneapolis: Winston.

Schwab. J.J., Bralow, M., & Holzer, C. (1967). A comparison of two rating scales for depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 94-96.

Seligman, M.E. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.

Shaw, B.F. (1977). Comparison of cognitive therapy and behavior therapy in the treatment of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 543-551.

Sorenson, D. (2003). Healing traumatizing provider interactions among women through short-term group therapy, Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 17, (6), 259-269.

Tinsley, E.G., Sullivan-Guest, S., & McGuire, J. (1984). Feminine sex role and depression in middle-aged women. Sex Roles, II, 25-32.

Tucker, S.J. (1977). The menopause: How much soma and how much psyche? JOCN Nursing, 6, 40-47.

Twin Cities Community Program for Affordable Health Care. (1984). Ambulatory and Transitional Care Project. Health Association Center, 221 University Avenue S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55414.

Usher, S., & Fels, M. (1985). The challenge of feminism and career for the middle-aged woman. International Journal of Women's Studies, 8(1), 47-57.

van Keep, P., & Prill, H. (1975). Psychosociology of menopause and post-menopause. Frontiers in Hormone Research,. 3, 32-39.

van Servellen, G., & Dull, L. (1981). Group psychotherapy for depressed women: A model. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health Services, 19, 25-30.

Vemura, M.A., Young, D.E., Feldman, M.J., Pastore, P., Pikula, S., & Yates, M.A. (1985). Cost savings as an indicator of successful nursing intervention. Nursing Research, J4(l), 50-53.

Walker, L.E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper and Row.

Weissman, M. (1981). Women: The major victims of depression. Medical Times, 109( I), 24-36.

Weissman, M., & Klerman, G. (1977). Sex differences and the epidemiology of depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 98-109.

Wood, H.P., & Duffy, E.L. (1966). Psychological factors in alcoholic women. American Journal of Psychiatry, 123(3), 341.345.

Young, S.E. (1981). Cognitive therapy and loneliness. In G. Emery, S. Hollon, & R. Bedrosian (Eds.). New Directions in Cognitive Therapy (pp. 39.159). New York: Guilford.